|   | 
            
               ROBERT PARRY WINS 2017 MARTHA
                  GELLHORN PRIZE FOR JOURNALISM 
              John Pilger made the following remarks in presenting
                  the 15th Martha Gellhorn Prize to the American
                  journalist Robert Parry at a dinner in London on 27
                  June. 
                 
                There are too many awards for journalism. Too many
                simply celebrate the status quo.  The idea that
                journalists ought to challenge the status quo – what
                Orwell called Newspeak and Robert Parry calls
                ‘groupthink’ – is becoming increasingly rare. 
                  
                More than a generation ago, a space opened up for a
                journalism that dissented from the groupthink and
                flourished briefly and often tenuously in the press and
                broadcasting. Today, that space has almost closed in the
                so-called mainstream media. The best journalists have
                become – often against their will – dissidents.  
                  
                The Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism recognises
                these honourable exceptions. It is very different from
                other prizes. Let me quote in full why we give this
                award: 
                  
                ‘The Gellhorn Prize is in honour of one of the 20th
                century’s greatest reporters. It is awarded to a
                journalist whose work has penetrated the established
                version of events and told an unpalatable truth – a
                truth validated by powerful facts that expose what
                Martha Gellhorn called “official drivel”. She meant
                establishment propaganda.’ 
                  
                Martha was renowned as a war reporter. Her dispatches
                from Spain in the 1930s and D-Day in 1944 are classics.
                But she was more than that. As both a reporter and a
                committed humanitarian, she was a pioneer: one of the
                first in Vietnam to report what she called ‘a new kind
                of war against civilians’: a precursor to the wars of
                today. 
                  
                She was the reason I was sent to Vietnam as a reporter.
                My editor had spread across his desk her articles that
                had run in the Guardian and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
                A headline read, ‘Targeting the people.’ For that
                series, she was placed on a black-list by the US
                military and never allowed to return to South Vietnam. 
                  
                She and I became good friends. Indeed, all my fellow
                judges of the Martha Gellhorn Prize – Sandy and Shirlee
                Matthews, James Fox, Jeremy Harding – have that in
                common. We keep her memory. 
                  
                She was indefatigable. She would call very early in the
                morning and open up the conversation with one of her
                favourite expressions – ‘I smell a rat’. 
                  
                When, in 1990, President George Bush Senior invaded
                Panama on the pretext of nabbing his old CIA buddy
                General Noriega, the embedded media made almost no
                mention of civilian suffering. 
                  
                My phone rang. ‘I smell a rat’, said a familiar voice. 
                  
                Within 24 hours Martha was on a plane to Panama. She was
                then in her 80s. She went straight to the barrios of
                Panama City, and walked from door to door, interviewing
                ordinary people.  That was the way she worked – in
                apartheid South Africa, in the favelas of Brazil, in the
                villages of Vietnam. 
                  
                She estimated that the American bombing and invasion of
                Panama had killed at least 6,000 people. 
                  
                She flew to Washington and stood up at a press
                conference at the Pentagon and asked a general: ‘Why did
                you kill so many people then lie about it?’ 
                  
                Imagine that question being asked today.  And that
                is what we are honouring this evening. Truth-telling,
                and the courage to find out, to ask the forbidden
                question. 
                  
                Robert Parry is a very distinguished honourable
                exception. 
               I first heard of Bob Parry in the 1980s when he broke
                the Iran-Contra scandal as an Associated Press reporter.
                This was a story as important as Watergate. Some would
                say it was more important. 
                  
                The administration of Ronald Reagan had secretly and
                illegally sold weapons to Iran in order to secretly and
                illegally bankroll a bloodthirsty group known as the
                Contras, which was then trying to crush Nicaragua’s
                Sandinista government – on behalf of the CIA. You could
                barely make it up.    
                  
                Bob Parry’s career has been devoted to finding out,
                lifting rocks – and supporting others who do the same. 
                  
                In the 1990s, he supported Gary Webb, who revealed that
                the Reagan administration had allowed the Contras to
                traffic cocaine in the US. For this, Webb was crucified
                by the so-called mainstream media, and took his own
                life. 
                  
                Lifting the big rocks can be as dangerous as a
                warzone.                                      
                 
                                                                                                             
                 
                In 1995, Parry founded his own news service, the
                Consortium for Independent Journalism. But, really,
                there was just him. Today, his website consortiumnews.com
                reflects the authority and dissidence that marks Parry’s
                career. 
                  
                What he does is make sense of the news – why Saudi
                Arabia should be held accountable; why the invasion of
                Libya was a folly and a crime; why the New York Times is
                an apologist for great power; why Hillary Clinton and
                Donald Trump have much in common; why Russia is not our
                enemy; why history is critical to understanding. 
                  
                For his journalism, Robert Parry is the winner of the
                2017 Martha Gellhorn Prize. He joins the likes of Robert
                Fisk, Iona Craig, Patrick Cockburn, Mohammed Omer, Dahr
                Jamail, Marie Colvin, Julian Assange, Gareth Porter and
                other honourable exceptions.   
               
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
             | 
              |